|
Key Takeaways
|
|
I want to challenge a deeply held belief in our industry, one that I once championed myself: the idea that more data is the answer. We've spent a fortune building vast data lakes of network telemetry, believing that if we could just collect everything, we would achieve a state of operational nirvana.
The reality, however, feels less like nirvana and more like a recurring nightmare. Dashboards, events, and alerts burn out your best people, not because of a lack of data, but because of its overwhelming, context-free abundance. We didn't solve the visibility problem; we just buried it under an avalanche of noise. We’ve given our teams a library containing every book ever written but fired all the librarians. This is the paradox we've engineered: In our quest for total visibility, we have ironically made it harder to see.
This is not just a networking problem; it’s a fundamental challenge of intelligence itself. I was struck by a recent conversation with AI pioneer Yann LeCun. He argues that for AI to approach anything like human or animal intelligence, it must learn not just how to process information, but how to ignore it. A baby learns that an unsupported object will fall, not by memorizing the trajectory of every dust mote in the air, but by grasping the essential pattern and discarding the irrelevant details. An AI model that tries to predict every single pixel in a video is, as he puts it, "setting it up for failure." True intelligence is as much about filtering the noise as it is about processing the signal.
This idea is counter-intuitive and deeply relevant to the world of network management. For years, we've operated on the assumption that more data is always better. The result is a suite of monitoring tools that function like an inefficient AI, incapable of ignoring anything. These tools are designed to see every event, every minor fluctuation, and to alert on it. This creates a state of constant, low-grade panic and a condition known as alert fatigue. Your engineers, your most valuable resources, are forced to become human filters, sifting through an endless stream of non-critical notifications, desperately trying to spot the one that truly matters. The cognitive load is immense, and the risk of a critical event being lost in the noise is a near certainty.
This is where we must redefine our understanding of observability. True network observability isn't a bigger data lake or a more granular chart. It is an intelligence layer. Its primary job is to act as a powerful and sophisticated filter. It’s a system designed to practice the art of intelligent ignorance.
How does it achieve this? Through context. By understanding the entire, end-to-end service delivery path—from the user's device, across the chaotic wilderness of the internet, through the cloud provider's backbone, and all the way to the application itself—observability builds a world model of your services.
With this contextual model, the system can make intelligent decisions about what matters and what can be safely ignored. It can understand that a 50% CPU spike on a redundant, non-critical access switch in an empty office is just noise. But it can also recognize that a subtle, 0.5% increase in packet loss on a specific ISP peering point is the critical signal that foretells a failure of your primary CRM application for an entire geographic area. This is not about simply correlating alerts; it's about understanding causality.
When your management platform learns what to ignore, it fundamentally transforms the role of your network operations team. The endless barrage of meaningless alerts ceases. An alert becomes a rare, but always significant event. The cognitive burden on your engineers is lifted. They are no longer data janitors, but strategic problem-solvers.
This frees your most experienced people from the soul-crushing cycle of reactive firefighting. They can stop chasing ghosts and start architecting a more resilient future. This is how you address the skills gap—not by trying to hire more people to stare at more screens, but by empowering the experts you already have. You give them tools that amplify their intelligence instead of overwhelming their senses.
We have mastered the science of collecting everything. The next, more difficult, step is to master the art of seeing almost nothing. The goal is a quieter, more focused operations center. If your current strategy is still based on the principle of "see everything, alert on everything," you don't have a visibility strategy—you have a noise generation strategy. It is time to embrace the art of seeing less to understand more.
Your strategy must evolve from noise generation to signal detection, and that requires an observability platform engineered for clarity. To see how you can empower your teams to master the art of seeing less and understanding more, explore what's possible with DX NetOps.